Parent Advocates
Search All  
The goal of ParentAdvocates.org
is to put tax dollar expenditures and other monies used or spent by our federal, state and/or city governments before your eyes and in your hands.

Through our website, you can learn your rights as a taxpayer and parent as well as to which programs, monies and more you may be entitled...and why you may not be able to exercise these rights.

Mission Statement

Click this button to share this site...


Bookmark and Share












Who We Are »
Find out more about the people behind the site

Help Us to Continue to Help Others »
A better education system is a cause worth supporting

Contact

 
The E-Accountability Foundation announces the

'A for Accountability' Award

to those who are willing to whistleblow unjust, misleading, or false actions and claims of the politico-educational complex in order to bring about educational reform in favor of children of all races, intellectual ability and economic status. They ask questions that need to be asked, such as "where is the money?" and "Why does it have to be this way?" and they never give up. These people have withstood adversity and have held those who seem not to believe in honesty, integrity and compassion accountable for their actions. The winners of our "A" work to expose wrong-doing not for themselves, but for others - total strangers - for the "Greater Good"of the community and, by their actions, exemplify courage and self-less passion. They are parent advocates. We salute you.

Winners of the "A":

Johnnie Mae Allen
Dee Alpert
Francesco Alexander Portelos
Harris Lirtzman
Hipolito Colon
Jim Calantjis
Larry Fisher
The Giraffe Project and Giraffe Heroes' Program
Jimmy Kilpatrick and George Scott
Zach Kopplin
Matthew LaClair
Wangari Maathai
Erich Martel
Steve Orel, in memoriam, Interversity, and The World of Opportunity
Marla Ruzicka, in Memoriam
Nancy Swan
Bob Witanek
Peyton Wolcott
[ More Details » ]
 
How Many Innocent People Are In Prison?
"Justice has nothing to do with what goes on in a courtroom; Justice is what comes out of a courtroom” Clarence Darrow
          
How Many Innocent People Are in Prison?
The exact number is unknown—but may be 20,000 or more. Plus: an interactive map, and rarely seen video of Rick Perry pardoning a dead man.
By Beth Schwartzapfel and Hannah Levintova | Mon Dec. 12, 2011
LINK

Read the story: How Rick Perry was forced to pardon an innocent man—years after he'd died behind bars.
Before we talk about how many people may be behind bars for crimes they did not commit, we must acknowledge that it's nearly impossible to know—only broad estimates are possible. There are several key reasons, experts say, why a number is so hard to ascertain. Because the sprawling criminal justice system is a patchwork of federal, state, county, and municipal courts, prisons, and jails—each with its own system (or lack thereof) of record-keeping and data-reporting—we don't even know how many people are convicted, let alone wrongfully convicted, of crimes in the United States. "We don’t even have a denominator," says University of Virginia law professor Brandon Garrett. "But the wrongful convictions we do know about suggest that there's a big problem."

Extrapolating from the 281 known DNA exonerations in the US since the late 1980s, a conservative estimate is that 1 percent of the US prison population, approximately 20,000 people, are falsely convicted.

In fact, since the late 1980s there have been as many as 850 exonerations nationwide, according to University of Michigan law professor Samuel Gross, a leading researcher in the field. Many of them float under the radar, Gross says, unlike the highly publicized DNA exonerations.

The following map shows the 825 known exonerations in the United States since 1989, using data gathered by Mother Jones with assistance from the Center on Wrongful Convictions, The Innocence Project,? and Samuel Gross. Click on each state for further details, including whether it has a compensation law for people who are wrongfully imprisoned:

See legend map

These cases are the tip of an iceberg. "One difficulty in making generalizations about false convictions is that the ones we know about, exonerations, are clearly a small and unrepresentative sample of all false convictions," wrote Gross in his 2008 paper, "Frequency and Predictors of False Conviction." There are several reasons why the known exoneration cases are unrepresentative...(see article link - Editor).

Because the average time from conviction to exoneration is about 13 years, only those sentenced to serious crimes with decades-long prison terms are likely to even bother undertaking the long, arduous, and resource-intensive process of clearing their names.

The vast majority of DNA exonerations are in a tiny sliver of cases: aggravated rape and rape-murders that occurred in the 1980s. That's because it's almost exclusively rape cases in which there is DNA available to test—and because these types of wrongful convictions rarely occur anymore.
Now, prosecutors typically test DNA before charging a suspect. In one study in which the FBI did DNA testing during the course of its investigations, 25 percent of suspects were ruled out by the DNA testing. Before the advent of DNA testing, some of these suspects may well have gone on to be tried, and, possibly, convicted.

Moreover, a tiny amount of total criminal cases actually go to trial. Nineteen out of twenty, or 95 percent, of convictions in the US are by plea bargain—and so we know little about them. They "generate virtually no records that can be retrieved," writes Gross: "no trial transcripts, no appeals, frequently no court hearings of any sort, in many cases no description of the investigation at all beyond a single police report, which (if it could be found) might include little factual information of any value."

The only cases for which we know the denominator, and for which we almost always have trial transcripts, are death penalty cases. However, the wrongful conviction rate in death penalty cases is probably higher than that of other cases, Gross says, for two reasons: First, capital cases are high-profile, emotional cases in which prosecutors face a lot of pressure to secure a conviction. On the other hand, because of the seriousness of the crime, capital defendants are afforded many more legal protections than those facing lesser penalties—unlike other defendants, they are provided lawyers for every step of the appeals process, and their cases receive major scrutiny from innocence projects and other advocates.

Gross' 2008 analysis found that the rate of exoneration for all capital defendants in the recent era is 2.3 percent. If the rate of exoneration for all non-death-row crimes (which is unknown) were the same, then there could have been as many as 87,000 exonerations of that kind from 1989-2003.

In 2010, Rick Perry became the first Texas governor in history to pardon a dead man. Watch the footage below, and read our full investigation of the life and death of Timothy Cole, who was falsely convicted and died behind bars.

The Pragmatic Pundit

New York State Compensation Law

 
© 2003 The E-Accountability Foundation