Parent Advocates
Search All  
The goal of
is to put tax dollar expenditures and other monies used or spent by our federal, state and/or city governments before your eyes and in your hands.

Through our website, you can learn your rights as a taxpayer and parent as well as to which programs, monies and more you may be entitled...and why you may not be able to exercise these rights.

Mission Statement

Click this button to share this site...

Bookmark and Share

Who We Are »
Betsy Combier

Help Us to Continue to Help Others »

The E-Accountability Foundation announces the

'A for Accountability' Award

to those who are willing to whistleblow unjust, misleading, or false actions and claims of the politico-educational complex in order to bring about educational reform in favor of children of all races, intellectual ability and economic status. They ask questions that need to be asked, such as "where is the money?" and "Why does it have to be this way?" and they never give up. These people have withstood adversity and have held those who seem not to believe in honesty, integrity and compassion accountable for their actions. The winners of our "A" work to expose wrong-doing not for themselves, but for others - total strangers - for the "Greater Good"of the community and, by their actions, exemplify courage and self-less passion. They are parent advocates. We salute you.

Winners of the "A":

Johnnie Mae Allen
David Possner
Dee Alpert
Aaron Carr
Harris Lirtzman
Hipolito Colon
Larry Fisher
The Giraffe Project and Giraffe Heroes' Program
Jimmy Kilpatrick and George Scott
Zach Kopplin
Matthew LaClair
Wangari Maathai
Erich Martel
Steve Orel, in memoriam, Interversity, and The World of Opportunity
Marla Ruzicka, in Memoriam
Nancy Swan
Bob Witanek
Peyton Wolcott
[ More Details » ]
Adira Polite ’18 Publishes Research on Racial Bias in Restorative Justice
Her research demonstrates that despite the documented successes of restorative justice in juvenile criminal cases, in places like New Zealand, the US court system has not widely adopted the practice. And when courts do embrace it, they tend to apply it unfairly.
   Adira Polite   
Research that Adira Polite ’18 began at Bowdoin when she was a Mellon Mays fellow finds a troubling trend of racial bias in restorative justice practices for juveniles across the country.

Polite's article, "To the Roots and Wounds: The Case for Restorative Justice in the Juvenile Correctional System," was recently published in Harvard University's Mellon Mays Undergraduate Research Journal.

Her research demonstrates that despite the documented successes of restorative justice in juvenile criminal cases, in places like New Zealand, the US court system has not widely adopted the practice. And when courts do embrace it, they tend to apply it unfairly.

Polite shows that the use of restorative justice, a decision left to a judge's discretion, is much more common for cases involving young white offenders than juveniles of color.

Restorative justice offers an alternative track for meting out punishment, replacing traditional hearings and jail time with what is known as family group conferencing. In the conference, a facilitator mediates a conversation among the offender(s), victim(s), affected community member(s), and law enforcement. The group is tasked with negotiating a resolution.

Studies have established that restorative justice leads to higher satisfaction rates for victims and lower rates of recidivism for offenders. "Community-based approaches, such as restorative justice, respond not to the offense itself, but to the offense's roots and resulting wounds," Polite writes.

But the benefits of the restorative justice approach are not being shared equally. In Colorado, for example, though praised for its "embrace of alternative corrective practices," only three of the 264 juveniles in 2016 recommended for restorative justice were black. At the same time, black youth accounted for twenty percent of the state's juvenile detention population.

Polite says that those "harboring social capital"—that is, those with strong social and community networks—have a significant advantage when it comes to being recommended for restorative justice. "A young offender’s community members may refer them to a court official or restorative justice provider. More often, offenders are referred by law enforcement, prosecutors, probation officers, or prison staff," she adds. After reviewing the referrals, a judge will make a final decision.

Though some recent judicial research has explored the racial imbalance Polite highlights in her work, the issue "is largely absent within contemporary restorative justice discourse," she writes. "The inattention to this disparity contradicts the seemingly progressive objectives of the practice's leading proponents."

In her paper, Polite argues for a standardization of restorative justice practices across US courts to not only reduce racial bias and improve outcomes for victims and offenders, but also to save money. "By diverting juveniles away from lengthy court proceedings and incarceration and toward family-group conferencing, states will reap substantial savings," she writes.

Polite, who was an Africana studies major at Bowdoin, is now working as a capital habeas paralegal for the Federal Defender Program in Atlanta, Georgia, where she assists attorneys in the representation of indigent, death-sentenced clients. "I've always had an obnoxious fixation on justice," she said. "My mother would definitely say that my childhood catchphrase was, 'that’s not fair.'"

Both her college research and current job were inspired by a story she heard as a middle schooler in a Georgetown University summer law program, when she listened to testimony from a man convicted for murder when he was seventeen. He was released after spending most of his life in jail, and went on to start an organization to help other former inmates transition to life after prison.

"Unlike most offenders, he was given the opportunity to prove that he could and would change. And he did," Polite said. "His story permanently altered my perception of crime and criminals."

© 2003 The E-Accountability Foundation