Parent Advocates
Search All  
The goal of ParentAdvocates.org
is to put tax dollar expenditures and other monies used or spent by our federal, state and/or city governments before your eyes and in your hands.

Through our website, you can learn your rights as a taxpayer and parent as well as to which programs, monies and more you may be entitled...and why you may not be able to exercise these rights.

Mission Statement

Click this button to share this site...


Bookmark and Share











Who We Are »
Betsy Combier

Help Us to Continue to Help Others »
Email: betsy.combier@gmail.com

 
The E-Accountability Foundation announces the

'A for Accountability' Award

to those who are willing to whistleblow unjust, misleading, or false actions and claims of the politico-educational complex in order to bring about educational reform in favor of children of all races, intellectual ability and economic status. They ask questions that need to be asked, such as "where is the money?" and "Why does it have to be this way?" and they never give up. These people have withstood adversity and have held those who seem not to believe in honesty, integrity and compassion accountable for their actions. The winners of our "A" work to expose wrong-doing not for themselves, but for others - total strangers - for the "Greater Good"of the community and, by their actions, exemplify courage and self-less passion. They are parent advocates. We salute you.

Winners of the "A":

Johnnie Mae Allen
David Possner
Dee Alpert
Aaron Carr
Harris Lirtzman
Hipolito Colon
Larry Fisher
The Giraffe Project and Giraffe Heroes' Program
Jimmy Kilpatrick and George Scott
Zach Kopplin
Matthew LaClair
Wangari Maathai
Erich Martel
Steve Orel, in memoriam, Interversity, and The World of Opportunity
Marla Ruzicka, in Memoriam
Nancy Swan
Bob Witanek
Peyton Wolcott
[ More Details » ]
 
Presidential Election 2004: 'Mud-Slinging' and Moral Values were Important Issues
Print and save the report issued by the Pew Charitable Trusts. Take a look at it in 31/2 years, and you may get a sense of where the country is in terms of using the internet for political opinion as well as issues dealing with morals or negative campaigns.
          
Public opinion and polls:
Mud Slinging, Moral Values Were Issues for Voters in 2004
The Pew Charitable Trusts, November 2004

LINK

Campaign 2004 gets generally favorable marks from the voters. An overwhelming 86 percent say they learned enough about the candidates to make an informed choice, while two-thirds express satisfaction with the choice of candidates. However, voters also believe this campaign was more negative than previous contests - 72 percent say there was more mud-slinging compared with past elections, up from just 34 percent who said that four years ago.

The Pew Research Center's quadrennial post-election survey, conducted among 1,209 voters who were originally interviewed in October, finds that a third of all voters say they are very satisfied with their choice of candidates - the highest percentage expressing that view in post-election surveys dating to 1988. This reflects extraordinary enthusiasm among Republicans, 63 percent of whom express a high degree of satisfaction with the candidates.

For their part, supporters of Sen. John Kerry are struggling with a range of emotions following their candidate's defeat. Liberals, in particular, express intense feelings over the election. Roughly half of Kerry's liberal supporters say they feel angry (53 percent) or depressed (47 percent) because of Bush's victory.

In contrast, large majorities of Bush voters say they feel reassured, relieved and safer as a consequence of the president's reelection. However, while 72 percent of Bush's conservative supporters say they feel a sense of excitement as a result of Bush's win, just 48 percent of moderate and liberal Republicans share that sentiment.

The survey's findings parallel exit poll results showing that moral values is a top-tier issue for voters. But its relative importance depends greatly on how the question is framed. The post-election survey finds that, when moral values is pitted against issues like Iraq and terrorism, a plurality (27 percent) cites moral values as most important to their vote.

But when a separate group of voters was asked to name - in their own words - the most important factor in their vote, significantly fewer (14 percent) mentioned moral values. Regardless of how the question is asked, the survey shows that moral values is the most frequently cited issue for Bush voters, but is seldom mentioned by Kerry voters.

Those who cite moral values as a major factor offer varying interpretations of the concept. More than four-in-ten (44 percent) say the term relates to concerns over specific social issues, such as abortion and gay marriage. But many others did not cite policy issues, and instead pointed to factors like the candidates' personal traits or made general references to religion and values.

The survey finds that the Internet has broken through as a major source of campaign news. Overall, 41 percent voters say they got at least some of their news about the 2004 election online. Further, 21 percent relied on the Internet for most of their election news - nearly double the number in 2000 (11 percent).

Voters are increasingly troubled by what they see as the media's unfair treatment of the candidates. While a majority (56 percent) views press coverage of Bush's campaign as fair, 40 percent think it was unfair, up from 30 percent four years ago. A smaller but growing minority also believes press coverage of Kerry was unfair -- 31 percent say that now, compared with 24 percent who faulted press coverage of Al Gore's campaign four years ago.

View the survey report -- Moral Values: How Important? Voters Liked Campaign 2004, But Too Much "Mud Slinging".

 
© 2003 The E-Accountability Foundation