Parent Advocates
Search All  
The goal of ParentAdvocates.org
is to put tax dollar expenditures and other monies used or spent by our federal, state and/or city governments before your eyes and in your hands.

Through our website, you can learn your rights as a taxpayer and parent as well as to which programs, monies and more you may be entitled...and why you may not be able to exercise these rights.

Mission Statement

Click this button to share this site...


Bookmark and Share











Who We Are »
Betsy Combier

Help Us to Continue to Help Others »
Email: betsy.combier@gmail.com

 
The E-Accountability Foundation announces the

'A for Accountability' Award

to those who are willing to whistleblow unjust, misleading, or false actions and claims of the politico-educational complex in order to bring about educational reform in favor of children of all races, intellectual ability and economic status. They ask questions that need to be asked, such as "where is the money?" and "Why does it have to be this way?" and they never give up. These people have withstood adversity and have held those who seem not to believe in honesty, integrity and compassion accountable for their actions. The winners of our "A" work to expose wrong-doing not for themselves, but for others - total strangers - for the "Greater Good"of the community and, by their actions, exemplify courage and self-less passion. They are parent advocates. We salute you.

Winners of the "A":

Johnnie Mae Allen
David Possner
Dee Alpert
Aaron Carr
Harris Lirtzman
Hipolito Colon
Larry Fisher
The Giraffe Project and Giraffe Heroes' Program
Jimmy Kilpatrick and George Scott
Zach Kopplin
Matthew LaClair
Wangari Maathai
Erich Martel
Steve Orel, in memoriam, Interversity, and The World of Opportunity
Marla Ruzicka, in Memoriam
Nancy Swan
Bob Witanek
Peyton Wolcott
[ More Details » ]
 
Schools Are Scary To Teachers, Lawsuits are in the Air

School Suits
by Tresa Baldas
National Law Journal
May 17, 2004

Eighty-two percent of teachers and 77 percent of principals say the current legal climate is leading to defensive teaching--decisions are motivated by a desire to avoid legal challenges. This was the finding of a recent Harris Poll commissioned by Common Good and reported on by the National Law Journal (NLJ) on May 17, 2004.

"The overhanging threat of law in schools is like the anaconda in a chandelier--it's sort of looking down on you, poised to strike," CG Director of Policy Nancy Udell told NLJ:

"Schools are seeing lawsuits of all kinds, from students angry over bad grades to excessive-punishment cases to complaints like "my kid didn't make the cheerleading squad."... [W]hile there is no data on how many suits are filed against schools, educators fear the climate is ripe for more legal challenges as education has grown more complex. ... [S]ince the U.S. Supreme Court's landmark 1974 Goss v. Lopez case, which recognized the rights of students to some due process, 1,200 school discipline cases have gone to the appellate level."

School attorney Sharon Moore agrees that legal challenges are altering the way educators interact with students. "The effect that being a defendant in a lawsuit [has] for a teacher or an educator can't be underestimated. It's very intimidating," she said. "I feel that coaches and educators in general are going to be much more concerned about their potential liability when they have dealings with a student and have to criticize that student."

But Attorney Kevin Little disagrees:

[He] represents a California student suing over a bad grade, [and] said that "unfortunately, the law does not go far enough" in protecting students from unfair teaching practices. ...

Little represents eighth grader Brandy Hurd, who on April 11 sued a teacher and superintendent with the Island Union Elementary School District over a C grade she received in physical education last year. Hurd v. Hansen, No. CIV-F-04-5560 AWI DLB (E.D. Calif.). Little said the grade affected Hurd's standing as class valedictorian. He said the teacher, Julie Hansen, unfairly graded Hurd, whom he described as a straight-A student and top athlete, and that Hansen's assessment may have been racially motivated.

Attorney Robert Rosati, who is representing the teacher and superintendent, said Hurd's grade was a result of a poor attitude. He said Hurd and several other seventh graders would walk around the racetrack, instead of running as told.

"Apparently the lady had a bad attitude with the teacher," said Rosati, of Sanjoaquin Partnership in Fresno. "It says right on the report card-effort and attitude. It's not a measure of athletic ability."

Rosati called the suit "frivolous" with little chance for survival. He said in the 15 years that he has defended schools, he's handled about 150 lawsuits and lost only twice.

Education law expert Perry Zirkel suggested that litigation isn't a problem in our public schools because, "If you look at the ultimate outcomes of these frivolous suits, school districts consistently win them."

Zirkel is right that courst favor schools, Udell told NLJ. "But even if shools win most of the time ... what damage is done by time-consuming and costly suits?"

"People have to be dragged into court, be deposed and be cross-examined and [forced to] take time away from teaching," she said. "No one wants to go through that."

 
© 2003 The E-Accountability Foundation