Parent Advocates
Search All  
The goal of
is to put tax dollar expenditures and other monies used or spent by our federal, state and/or city governments before your eyes and in your hands.

Through our website, you can learn your rights as a taxpayer and parent as well as to which programs, monies and more you may be entitled...and why you may not be able to exercise these rights.

Mission Statement

Click this button to share this site...

Bookmark and Share

Who We Are »
Betsy Combier

Help Us to Continue to Help Others »

The E-Accountability Foundation announces the

'A for Accountability' Award

to those who are willing to whistleblow unjust, misleading, or false actions and claims of the politico-educational complex in order to bring about educational reform in favor of children of all races, intellectual ability and economic status. They ask questions that need to be asked, such as "where is the money?" and "Why does it have to be this way?" and they never give up. These people have withstood adversity and have held those who seem not to believe in honesty, integrity and compassion accountable for their actions. The winners of our "A" work to expose wrong-doing not for themselves, but for others - total strangers - for the "Greater Good"of the community and, by their actions, exemplify courage and self-less passion. They are parent advocates. We salute you.

Winners of the "A":

Johnnie Mae Allen
David Possner
Dee Alpert
Aaron Carr
Harris Lirtzman
Hipolito Colon
Larry Fisher
The Giraffe Project and Giraffe Heroes' Program
Jimmy Kilpatrick and George Scott
Zach Kopplin
Matthew LaClair
Wangari Maathai
Erich Martel
Steve Orel, in memoriam, Interversity, and The World of Opportunity
Marla Ruzicka, in Memoriam
Nancy Swan
Bob Witanek
Peyton Wolcott
[ More Details » ]
U.S. Department of Education is Not Investigating Student Privacy Law FERPA Complaints
The U.S. Department of Education’s Inspector General’s office released a blistering audit last week, detailing how the department failed to conduct timely and effective investigations into alleged violations of the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) — the nation’s main student-data-privacy law, Education Week reports.
Ed Dept Under Fire Over FERPA Complaint Processes

Dive Brief:
The U.S. Department of Education’s Inspector General’s office released a blistering audit last week, detailing how the department failed to conduct timely and effective investigations into alleged violations of the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) — the nation’s main student-data-privacy law, Education Week reports.

According to the audit, the department’s privacy office had 285 open FERPA complaints in September 2017, with nearly a third being more than two years old and 31 cases having investigations finished but never officially closed because the paperwork wasn’t properly filed. The 24 cases the office did close during the 2017 fiscal year took an average of two years to complete.

Because of disorganization — there is no mechanism to track the number or status of complaints received — the Inspector General estimates that a years-long backlog has been created, and recommendations for improvement include modern software to track complaints, the allocation of resources for enforcement, and the end of the practice of leaving cases indefinitely active.

Dive Insight:
The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) was created in 1974 to protect the privacy of student records. The law has three purposes: It gives families the right to request their child's records, the opportunity to amend records, and some degree of control over how their child's data is dispersed and who can access it.

While families have a certain amount of agency under FERPA, it doesn't cover everything. For example, schools don't need to get parental consent to release data to other education officials.

For a long time, data — which includes everything from student grades and assessment scores to addresses, birth dates and attendance records — was maintained as hard copy records. But advances in technology have taken it to a new place: the cloud.

These advances make it easier to track information as a child transitions from elementary school to college, which from an efficiency standpoint is great. They also carry big implications around data and privacy abuse, making acts like FERPA, which was expanded in 2008 and 2011 to allow third-party vendors and "authorized representatives" of state authorities to collect data without parental consent, increasingly important.

As Education Week explains it, FERPA complaints today run the gamut, from instances where individual students believe their information was shared improperly to those where entire student bodies say a school demanded they waive rights under the law for enrollment. And backlogs aren't necessarily new to the current administration, but something the Education Department has been dealing with for decades.

How to fix that issue is something of puzzle. The audit points out that the privacy office received permission to hire five new staff members in 2015, but many of the staffers weren't placed on investigations. Rather, they were assigned to work with states and school districts on FERPA training and policy guidance. From the inspector general’s viewpoint, the office should have been working to resolve the current complaints, but it also acknowledged that working with states and districts on compliance could minimize cases in the future.

That reality creates a catch-22 that some advocates are aware of.

"A complaint is often the only recourse a parent has when they feel their child's privacy has been violated," Paige Kowalski, an executive vice president for the Data Quality Campaign, told Education Week. "But the department will never get ahead of its backlog if it's not also effectively delivering supports."

Recommended Reading:
Education Week
Inspector General Blasts U.S. Ed. Department's Handling of FERPA Complaints

Inspector General Blasts U.S. Ed. Department's Handling of FERPA Complaints
By Benjamin Herold on November 29, 2018 4:09 PM

The U.S. Education Department failed to conduct timely, effective investigations of potential violations of the nation's main student-data-privacy law, allowing a years-long backlog of unresolved cases to pile up without any mechanism for effectively tracking the number or status of the complaints it received.

That's according to a scathing new audit from the department's own Inspector General, released this week.

According to the audit, the department's privacy office in September 2017 had on its books 285 open investigations of complaints made under the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, or FERPA.

Nearly a third of those complaints were more than two years old, the audit found. In 31 cases during the 2017 fiscal year, the department completed investigations, but failed to officially close them, because the necessary paperwork was left to languish on managers' desks for as long as eight months. Even the two-dozen investigations the office did officially close took an average of more than two years to complete.

"The Privacy Office is not meeting its statutory obligation to appropriately enforce FERPA and resolve FERPA complaints," the Inspector General concluded. "Complainants' privacy rights are also not appropriately protected as FERPA intends."

Privacy advocates said the findings validate longstanding criticism of a process that has for years left parents frustrated and infuriated.

"They've felt completely left in the lurch," said activist Leonie Haimson, the co-chair of the Parent Coalition for Student Privacy. "Parents have these very serious complaints about their kids' privacy having been violated, and they go through the trouble of filing complaints, but they just sit for years without any kind of substantive response."

The Inspector General's report included a number of recommendations for improvement, including allocating "appropriate resources" to FERPA enforcement, implementing modern software to track complaints, and halting the practice of designating some cases as indefinitely inactive.

Department officials said they agreed with the suggestions and have already begun taking steps to address the problems.

Education Secretary Betsy DeVos "takes the recommendations in the OIG's report seriously and is committed to ensuring the resources and mechanisms are in place for the Department to meet its legal obligation under FERPA," department spokeswoman Elizabeth Hill said in a statement.

Enforcing FERPA
Passed in 1974, the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act gives parents the right to access their children's educational records and to seek changes in records they believe to be inaccurate.

Under the law, schools must generally obtain written consent before releasing any part of a student's educational record to third parties, although a number of exceptions apply.

According to the Inspector General audit, FERPA violations can harm children by exposing them to bullying or harassment, damaging their chances of graduating or finding employment, or by allowing their personal information to be improperly shared with vendors or other third parties.

Because of such risks, parents who believe their child's FERPA rights have been violated have the right to file complaints with the U.S. Education Department. Such complaints could focus on instances in which an individual student believes that his or her personal information was improperly shared, for example. Or, the complaints could be more wide-reaching, as in a recent case involving Pennsylvania's Agora Cyber Charter School, which was found to have been improperly demanding that its 8,000 students waive their FERPA rights as a condition of enrollment.

The education department is required by law to have an office charged with processing and investigating those complaints.

For decades, though, there has been a massive backlog, according to the Inspector General audit. The Agora case, for example, took five years to resolve.

Reasons for the delays include insufficient staff and resources, unresolved policy issues, and increasing volume and complexity of complaints, the audit found.

The Inspector General also criticized the department's privacy office for not sufficiently prioritizing its enforcement role.

In 2015, for example, the office received authority to hire five new staff members, but ultimately assigned the majority of them to work on providing states and school districts with FERPA-related technical assistance, training, and policy guidance.

"Although these other FERPA activities are important and can lead to fewer complaints in the future, it is critical that the privacy office focus its attention to timely and effectively resolve FERPA complaints," the audit reads.

That raised concerns from some in the education world, who said the best approach would be to make sure that enforcement and technical-assistance work both get the resources they need.

"We don't think the solution is to rob Peter to pay Paul," said Paige Kowalski, an executive vice president for the Data Quality Campaign.

"A complaint is often the only recourse a parent has when they feel their child's privacy has been violated," she said. "But the department will never get ahead of its backlog if it's not also effectively delivering supports."

'A Massive Loss of Trust'
In the meantime, though, the problems caused by the backlog have been far-reaching, said Amelia Vance, the director of education privacy and policy counsel at the Future of Privacy Forum, a Washington think tank.

"There's been a massive lost of trust, and a massive assumption that FERPA is toothless because of a lack of concrete enforcement actions," Vance said.

The department, for example, has never exercised its right to cut off all federal funds to a school or district as the result of FERPA violations, she said. Nor have any third parties, such as vendors, been banned from working with schools for up to five years, as the law allows.

Vance also called it "mind-boggling" that privacy officials in the education department were unable to tell the Inspector General how many open cases they had, the result of not having any real system for tracking the complaints prior to 2017.

Still, there have been signs of recent progress.

In recent months, Secretary DeVos has moved to reorganize the department's privacy functions and direct staff to focus their efforts on reducing the backlog of FERPA complaints. According to Hill, the education department spokeswoman, there has been a 43 percent reduction in the number of pending cases since May.

The Inspector General's report also included a detailed response from Denise L. Carter, the acting assistant secretary in the department's Office of Management, which oversees the privacy office.

The department generally concurred with the findings and its recommendations. Carter wrote:

Additional staff have already been reassigned to assist with processing FERPA complaints. The director of the compliance office was replaced with someone with "extensive FERPA expertise" and project-management experience.
The Office of Management is currently working to identify and implement a new complaint-tracking system. It will also soon begin using a new performance-management dashboard system to better track the work of the office as a whole, as well as individual staff.
Complaints will no longer indefinitely be designated as "inactive," and cases that were previously coded in that way have already been re-examined and addressed.
Multiple steps have been taken to improve communication with parents who file FERPA complaints, including automating the processes of letting people know their complaints have been received and dismissed.
The department is moving towards evaluating and responding to complaints based on their seriousness and the risks they present, rather than based solely on when they come in.
And, notably, the department agreed with the Inspector General that it should begin conducting "self-initiated" investigations in response to potential FERPA violations, rather than solely working in response to parents' complaints.

The first such investigation has already begun, the department acknowledged, although a request for details went unanswered.

Even if such action results only in a letter telling a school or third party not to engage in specific conduct anymore, that would be valuable, Vance said.

"It can be a lesson for everyone else in the country," she said. "This is what FERPA does and does not allow."

See also:

Reorganization of U.S. Ed. Department's Privacy Office to Take Effect in Early 2019

Beyond FERPA: Five Tips For Protecting Student Data

Stronger Data-Privacy Protections for Students and Teachers Needed, Report Argues

© 2003 The E-Accountability Foundation